
Post by Whitney Heckathorne, Marketing Manager and Baseball Neophyte
Much like Laura concluded last year, the baseball teams we love the most are, for the most part, the teams with the highest-paid rosters.
But times are tough, people! And baseball is very much a business. So in that sense, it not how much you win or lose, it’s how much money you can generate … er… it’s how much you are “loved.”
Thanks to CBS Sports’ 2010 MLB Team Pay Rankings, I was able to do a little hypothesizing, as to which teams are a “good value” based on their pay ranking AND where they fall in our annual Harris Poll “Favorite Baseball Teams” study.
The Question: Do the pay rankings for MLB teams synch up with how much they are loved? Are some teams overpaid, yet underloved? Are some teams overloved and underpaid? And whch teams have it all figured out?
Ladies and Gentleman, I present to you, my "Best Values in the MLB" chart...which teams are home runs in terms of value and which ones strike out?
|
Team |
Favorite Ranking |
Pay Ranking 2010 |
Home Run or Strike?* |
|
New York Yankees |
1 |
1 |
- |
|
Boston Red Sox |
2 |
2 |
- |
|
Atlanta Braves |
3 |
15 |
Home Run |
|
Philadelphia Phillies |
4 |
4 |
- |
|
Chicago Cubs |
5 |
3 |
Strike |
|
New York Mets |
6 |
5 |
Strike |
|
San Francisco Giants |
7 |
10 |
Home Run |
|
Los Angeles Dodgers |
8 |
12 |
Home Run |
|
Minnesota Twins |
9 |
11 |
Home Run |
|
St. Louis Cardinals |
10 |
13 |
Home Run |
|
Milwaukee Brewers |
11 |
18 |
Home Run |
|
Detroit Tiger |
12 |
6 |
Strike |
|
Seattle Mariners |
12 |
9 |
Strike |
|
Texas Rangers |
12 |
27 |
Home Run |
|
Chicago White Sox |
15 |
7 |
Strike |
|
Cincinnati Reds |
16 |
19 |
Home Run |
|
Cleveland Indians |
17 |
24 |
Home Run |
|
Arizona Diamondbacks |
18 |
25 |
Home Run |
|
Kansas City Royals |
19 |
20 |
Home Run |
|
Colorado Rockies |
20 |
16 |
Strike |
|
Baltimore Orioles |
20 |
17 |
Strike |
|
Tampa Bay Rays |
22 |
21 |
Strike |
|
Oakland Athletics |
23 |
28 |
Home Run |
|
San Diego Padres |
23 |
29 |
Home Run |
|
Los Angeles Angels |
25 |
8 |
Strike |
|
Pittsburgh Pirates |
25 |
30 |
Home Run |
|
Washington Nationals |
27 |
23 |
Strike |
|
Houston Astros |
28 |
14 |
Strike |
|
Florida Marlins |
29 |
26 |
Strike |
|
Toronto Blue Jays** |
30 |
22 |
- |
**Left the Blue Jays “unjudged”, as we don’t really know where they lie in the “favorite” ranking – this survey was conducted among U.S. adults, so it’s not surprising a Canadian team is at the bottom. Plus, who even knows if their pay ranking was converted from Canadian dollars?
Okay, so I really know nothing about baseball “home runs” or “strike outs,” per se. However, I speculate that teams do NOT become favorites because of their performance. Hence, why the Chicago Cubs are high on the favorite and pay list, while other, more recently "successful" teams still don’t get nearly as much love (think: World Series ’02 Champs, the Los Angeles Angels; World Series ’03 Champs, the Florida Marlins and ’05 Champs, the Chicago White Sox.
As you can see, very few teams have pay that coincides with their popularity… but those who have found an equilibrium tend to be near the very top of both the favorites and pay list (think: Yanks, BoSox, Phillies). The question is – does popularity eventually lead to higher pay? Or, does higher pay ensure more popularity?
Which came first – the chicken or the pay?